USPTO serial 78078643
CASTELL GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CASTELL GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saenz Pena, Buenos Aires, AR
Saenz Pena, Buenos Aires, AR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PCTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Edible oils; preserved olives; clams (not live); anchovy; tuna fish; preserved onions; preserved mushrooms; preserved vegetables; olive oil for food; raisins; gherkins; tomato puree; tomato juice for cooking; preserved truffles; canned fish; canned vegetables; pickles; vegetable salads; fruit salads; preserved fruit; sunflower oil for food; preserved garden herbs. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 16, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |