Drawing for TENDERLOIN TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 78078833

TENDERLOIN TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TENDERLOIN TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Boney Denison

MARY BONEY DENISON MANELLI DENISON & SELTER PLLC2000 M ST NW STE 700WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3364UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely shirts, pants, shorts, socks, skirts, dresses, headwear, undergarments, coats and jacketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 25, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 5, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 5, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 1, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 2, 2002EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance