USPTO serial 78078966
Serial No. 78078966
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78078966?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Caracas, Miranda, VE
Caracas, Miranda, VE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Cesarano
LISA A LANDY AKERMAN, SENTERFITT & EIDSON, PA1 S E 3RD AVE 28TH FLMIAMI, FL 33131-1714UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely providing live theatrical and multidisciplinary musical performances; visual and audio recording and production; music publishing services; and music production services | ACTIVE | Aug 25, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2006 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Sep 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 22, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |