Drawing for SOLID-IMRT

USPTO serial 78079221

SOLID-IMRT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EDWARDS, ALICIA COLLINS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SOLID-IMRT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John W. Villines

JOHN W VILLINES JV LAWPO BOX 580049MODESTO, CA 95358-0002UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Solid fabricating filter for modifying intensity of radiation fieldACTIVEMay 20, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 12, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance