USPTO serial 78079371
D DANA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WELLS, KELLEY L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D DANA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Gorla Maggiore (province of Varese), IT
Gorla Maggiore (province of Varese), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Kaufman
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER & NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Under-knitwear, namely, boxer shorts, body suits, singlets, vests, camisoles, tops, corsets, corselettes, slips, underskirts, underwear, panties, mini-briefs, bras, stockings, tights and suspender belts; beach wear for women, namely, bathing suits, beach dresses, pareos, and bathing gowns | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 12, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |