USPTO serial 78079655
EAG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EAG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
COLLEN IP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW.THE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEWESTCHESTER COUNTY, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics. | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, pants, overalls, shorts, shirts, sweaters, jackets, vests, t-shirts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, suspenders, hats, caps, headbands, underwear, sleepwear, scarves, workout gear, namely, sweat suits, sweat pants, sweat shirts, gym shorts, sneakers, leg-warmers, tights, tracksuits, wristbands, belts; outerwear, namely, ski pants, gloves, coats, earflaps, jackets, ski masks, vests, rainwear; a full line of men's clothing, children's clothing, namely jumpers, tights, dresses, socks, baby booties, coveralls, sweaters, short sets, denim jeans, creeper sets, jumpsuits, rompers, jacket sets and coordinated two and three piece playsuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |