USPTO serial 78079802
NETHOUSEUSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NETHOUSEUSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | NethouseUSA is a next generation Telecommunications services, namely, providing fiber optic network services, which construct optical networks within planned communities to enable "true broadband" connections to every home. NethouseUSA will also construct the latest home networking technologies for leading-edge customers in the broadband communities within the interior of the home, to include features which include home theater, surround sound, interior and exterior monitoring of premises, CAT5 installation, PC networking and alarm systems. NethouseUSA will lay fiber throughout planned communities and will wire homes using "specialized" wiring designed to handle high-speed services, such as CAT5 (for use with date and other communication devices) | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |