Drawing for ARENA EYEWEAR

USPTO serial 78079842

ARENA EYEWEAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANDIR, FREDERICK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARENA EYEWEAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. French

DAVID J FRENCH THE LAW OFFICE OF DAVID J. FRENCH700 225 METCALFE STOTTAWA, ON K2P 1P9CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009eye wear, namely sunglasses; cases for eyewear, namely sunglassesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 5, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 2, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 22, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 15, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 3, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 17, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance