USPTO serial 78080013
CLIPPER RECORD COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLIPPER RECORD COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shelby Township, MI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS, PRE-RECORDED AUDIO TAPES PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES ALL FEATURING (SPECIFIC, E.G., MUSIC) | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES FEATURING PRE-RECORDED PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, PRE-RECORDED COMPACT DISCS, PRE-RECORDED AUDIO TAPES PRE-RECORDED VIDEO TAPES ALL FEATURING (SPECIFIC, E.G., MUSIC) | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2008 | PRRD | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST DENIED | — |
| Jan 6, 2008 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2007 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 4, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |