USPTO serial 78080296
MASTERTRUST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTERTRUST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cohm J. Dobbyn
MASTERCARD INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATED2000 PURCHASE STPURCHASE, NY 10577-2509UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY BANKING AND CREDIT SERVICES; PROVIDING CREDIT CARD, DEBIT CARD, CHARGE CARD AND STORED VALUE PREPAID CARD SERVICES; ELECTRONIC COMMERCE PAYMENT SERVICES NAMELY, PROCESSING OF MICRO-PAYMENTS TO INTERNET RETAILERS, ELECTRONIC FUNDS AND CURRENCY TRANSFER SERVICES, ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SERVICES,NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA;PREPAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES, ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS,NAMELY, CASH DISBURSEMENT SERVICES, TRAVEL INSURANCE SERVICES, NAMELY UNDERWRITING AND BROKERAGE OF TRAVEL CANCELLATION INSURANCE AND OF HEALTH, LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE FOR TRAVELERS; ELECTRONIC DEBIT AND CREDIT CARD TRANSACTION AUTHORIZATION AND VIATICAL SETTLEMENT SERVICES; PROVISION OF DEBIT AND CREDIT SERVICES BY MEANS OF TRANSPONDERS WHICH USE RADIO SIGNALS TO TRANSMIT THE USER' S IDENTIFICATION CODE TO GASOLINE PUMPS OR REGISTERS IN ORDER TO AUTOMATICALLY PROVIDE ACCESS TO GASOLINE, FOOD OR MERCHANDISE WHILE AUTOMATICALLY CHARGING PURCHASES TO THE USER'S CREDIT OR DEBIT CARD;TRAVEL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING SERVICES; CHEQUE VERIFICATION SERVICES;ISSUING AND REDEMPTION SERVICES ALL RELATING TO TRAVELLERS' CHEQUES AND TRAVEL VOUCHERS; FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by MasterCard International Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named MASTERTRUST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2006 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |