USPTO serial 78080877
ALLANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 10, 2004
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ALLANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NAPERVILLE, IL
Executive Marketing Services, Inc.
Naperville, IL
Other trademarks owned by Executive Marketing Services, Inc.
NAPERVILLE, IL
NAPERVILLE, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen D. Lott
Stephen D. Lott Seyfarth Shaw LLP233 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 8000Chicago, IL 60606-6448United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | [ Printed publications, namely research reports in the fields of direct marketing, customer profiling and statistical and analytical analysis of computer databases of client information ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 4, 2001 |
| 035 | Mailing list, telephone number list and e-mail list preparation; Mailing list, telephone number list and e-mail list enhancement services, namely, preparing mailing lists, telephone number lists and e-mail lists by adding customer attributes, demographics, financial information, lifestyle information or other information; Rental of such mailing lists, telephone lists and e-mail lists to others; Preparing mailing lists, e-mail lists, or telephone lists by appending telephone numbers, addresses or e-mail addresses to customer lists of names, addresses, telephone numbers, or other customer information; Direct mail advertising services; Telephone and e-mail advertising services namely assisting others in the preparation of telephone and e-mail advertisements; Business management consultation featuring information on telemarketing, direct mail sales and other marketing activities; Business consulting services for business organization, strategic planning and marketing; Computerized database management; Information analysis, namely market analysis performed using client databases in the field of modeling, scoring and analytics, marketing and solicitation and customer profiles and creating reports from such client databases; Market analysis services in the nature of statistical analysis and sample design; Preparation of statistical business reports; Business consultation regarding customer profiling; Business information services, namely, providing business marketing information; Preparing business reports; Marketing research, analysis and consulting using a business database; Data processing services, namely processing sales and promotional data; Preparing business reports which feature an evaluation of responses to promotional activity and providing online computer databases containing such reports; Computerized database management in the pharmaceutical, publishing, financial services, retail, insurance, consumer goods, consumer credit and e-commerce fields; Direct marketing campaign management, namely, business marketing consulting services; Business consultation in the field of customer service and customer relations | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2001 |
| 036 | consultation services in the field of financial information, namely providing credit rating scoring services | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2001 |
| 039 | Storage services for archiving client databases that contain modeling, scoring and analytics, marketing, solicitation and customer profile data | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2001 |
| 042 | Computer consultation services, namely, management of the acquisition and development of database and marketing application software systems; Data warehousing and data mining in the fields of modeling, scoring and analytics, marketing and solicitation; Computer consultation services in the fields of web data mining, web site analysis and website usage recitation of services | ACTIVE | Sep 4, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLANT GROUP, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by Executive Marketing Services, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ALLANT GROUP, INC., THE
- Other trademarks owned by ALLANT GROUP, INC., THE
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ALLANT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2024 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 23, 2024 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| May 23, 2024 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 10, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 25, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 3, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 21, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 19, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |