USPTO serial 78081030
CU ASSOCIATION OF THE WEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 3, 2004
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CU ASSOCIATION OF THE WEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS H. WOLFE
THOMAS H WOLFE THE WOLFE LAW FIRM6200 E CANYON RIM RD #214ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92807UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | FORMS, STATIONARY, EDUCATIONAL BOOKS, MANUALS, PAMPHLETS AND GUIDES PERTAINING TO CREDIT UNION OPERATIONS, MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE FOR USE BY CREDIT UNIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 16, 2001 |
| 042 | ASSOCIATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROMOTING THE INTERESTS OF CREDIT UNIONS AND CREDIT UNION TRADE ASSOCIATIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 16, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 1, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 1, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 15, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |