Drawing for PCFACIL

USPTO serial 78081053

PCFACIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3131813Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 22, 2006
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PCFACIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Clement Cheng

CLEMENT CHENG NEWHOPE LAW PC4522 Katella Avenue, Suite 200Los Alamitos, CA 90720UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Providing educational services via a home study course in the field of computer scienceSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDMay 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 27, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 29, 2013C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Aug 22, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 30, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 31, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2005REINREINSTATED—
Oct 27, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 25, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 31, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 10, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 30, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance