Drawing for DRAGON COLLECTION

USPTO serial 78081068

DRAGON COLLECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DRAGON COLLECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brad D. Rose, Esq.

BRAD D ROSE ESQ PRYOR CASHMAN SHERMAN ET AL410 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-4441UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018All-purpose sports and athletic bags, fanny packs, backpacks, knapsacks, sports packs, waist packs, gym bags, duffel bags, tote bags, book bags, hand bags, purses, clutch purses, change purses, shoulder bags, carry-on bags, travel bags, garment bags for travel, beach bags, satchels, luggage, luggage tags, trunks, suitcases, cosmetic cases sold empty, toiletry cases sold empty, vanity cases sold empty, cosmetic bags sold empty, tool bags sold empty, attache cases, brief cases, brief-case type portfolios, men's clutches, business cases, business card cases, credit card cases, calling card cases, passport cases and holders, key cases, coin pouches, wallets, billfolds, umbrellas and parasolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 23, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 17, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 17, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance