Drawing for TRANSFORMING DIGITAL CAPITAL

USPTO serial 78081083

TRANSFORMING DIGITAL CAPITAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSFORMING DIGITAL CAPITAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lynne E. Graybeal

LYNNE E GRAYBEAL PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVESTE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3786

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business strategy and international marketing consulting services; database creation and management of large terminology repositories for terminology managementACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, computer software design services, computer software implementation services and computer software project management services; computer services, namely, computer programming services; computer software and modification services; computer software development services; computer consultation services; computer software translation and localization services; web page and web site translation and localization services; web site design services; product research and localization services; technical document authoring, translation and localization services; database development services; database translation and localization services; language translation and localization services; machine translation and linguistic technology services, namely written language translation services provided using computers and computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 24, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 24, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 24, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 8, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 16, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 25, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 16, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 12, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 10, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 27, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance