Drawing for TRANSLOCAL HEALTH

USPTO serial 78081204

TRANSLOCAL HEALTH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRANSLOCAL HEALTH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Claudia A. Smith

LAURA J WINSTON WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LL399 PARK AVE 32ND FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPACT DISCS AND DVDS FEATURING HEALTH CARE INFORMATION INTENDED FOR A VARIETY OF INDUSTRIESACTIVE—
016PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS, MAGAZINES, BROCHURES AND CUSTOM PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, NEWSLETTERS, MAGAZINES, BROCHURES FOR INDIVIDUAL CLIENTS ALL FEATURING HEALTH CARE INFORMATION INTENDED FOR A VARIETY OF INDUSTRIESACTIVE—
044PROVIDING HEALTH CARE INFORMATION TO A VARIETY OF INDUSTRIES THROUGH THE INTERNETACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 5, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 14, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 5, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 27, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 14, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 30, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 15, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance