Drawing for TUMBLEWEED SECURE GUARDIAN

USPTO serial 78081230

TUMBLEWEED SECURE GUARDIAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TUMBLEWEED SECURE GUARDIAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen S. Wilshinsky

KAREN S WILSHINSKY LAW OFFICE OF KAREN S WILSHINSKY,321 E 22ND ST 6TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in controlling computer viruses, restricting access to electronic messages, and enabling network communications and document delivery of electronic communications through encryptionACTIVESep 1, 2001
038Electronic transmission of data featuring encryption and decryptionACTIVESep 1, 2001
042Computer security services, namely, data encryption, notifying companies of computer viruses, and restricting access to sensitive electronic messages and documentsACTIVESep 1, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 6, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2004GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 30, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 25, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 8, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 2, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 2, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 6, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 14, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 24, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 4, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance