USPTO serial 78081597
KIOTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KIOTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer L. Bowman
DAEDONG-USA, INC1801 QUALITY DRWILSON, NC 27804UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Agricultural and landscaping tractor attachments and tractor-towed agricultural implements, namely, front-end loaders, backhoes, finish mowers, and tillers and replacement parts therefor | ACTIVE | Dec 8, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |