Drawing for DIAMONDCLUSTER BUSINESS SYNCHRONIZATION

USPTO serial 78081739

DIAMONDCLUSTER BUSINESS SYNCHRONIZATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMONDCLUSTER BUSINESS SYNCHRONIZATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Leonard Rubin

KENNETH K DORT GORDON & GLICKSON LLCSTE 3600444 N MICHIGAN AVECHICAGO, IL 60611-3903

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and consultation services.ACTIVE—
042Computer consulting services in the field of information technology, namely, strategic planning and project management of information technology development.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 22, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 21, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 31, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance