USPTO serial 78081955
LE SAINT COMPANIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2841482Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 11, 2004
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LE SAINT COMPANIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Advanced professional Scientific Research and engineering for defense contracting and government contracting, in the field of advanced technology, professional engineering services, government systems, aeronautics, aerospace studies, professional aeronautics, aircraft engineering technology, aerospace science, aerospace engineering, aerospace electronics, aeronautical systems maintenance, airway science, astrononautical, avionics engineering technology, nautical, space engineering, physics, space physics, astrophysics, engineering physics, architectural services, civil engineering, chemical engineering, computer science, computer engineering, computer systems engineering, software engineering, drafting services, electrical/electronic/communications engineering, environmental/environmental health engineering, industrial/manufacturing engineering, material engineering, mechanical engineering, nuclear engineering, petroleum engineering, security systems, weapon systems, medical technology, biomedical/biomedical engineering, medical/physical/life science, technical project management, professional technical services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 7, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by St.James, Gregory Marquis
- Other trademarks owned by St.James, Gregory Marquis
- Other trademarks owned by St.James, Gregory Marquis
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LE SAINT COMPANIES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 11, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2003 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |