USPTO serial 78082039
MOMS-TO-BABIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2872490Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2004
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MOMS-TO-BABIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Blue Bell, PA
Blue Bell, PA
Blue Bell, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Faye A. Dion
FAYE A DION AETNA INC151 FARMINGTON AVE # RC4AHARTFORD, CT 06156-0001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | WRITTEN MATERIALS, NAMELY, BOOKLETS, BROCHURES, AND LETTERS IN THE FIELD OF MATERNITY HEALTH | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2001 |
| 042 | HEALTH CARE SERVICES, NAMELY, ADMINISTRATION OF MATERNITY HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT SERVICES; PROVIDING HEALTH INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF MATERNITY HEALTH CARE VIA THE INTERNET | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 16, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |