USPTO serial 78082052
BIOSURF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOSURF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SYLVIA A PETROSKY
2273 SMITH RDAKRON, OH 44333-2924UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | All purpose cleaning solutions for professional facilities, namely, hospitals, dental offices and homes; dental therapeutic solutions, namely, cleaners for hard surfaces and metal objects, plastics, textiles and vinyl; immersion cleaner for objects and instruments; liquid cleaner for evacuation and suction tubing; liquid cleaner for ultrasonic cleaning baths; and non-medicated skin care preparations | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1994 |
| 005 | All purpose disinfectants for professional facilities, namely, hospitals, dental offices and homes; dental therapeutic solutions, namely, disinfectants for hard surfaces and metal objects, plastics, textiles and vinyl; immersion disinfectant for objects and instruments; liquid disinfectant for evacuation suction tubing; liquid disinfectant for ultrasonic cleaning baths; and medicated skin care preparations | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |