USPTO serial 78083686
MITHRIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MITHRIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry, namely, rings, bracelets, pendants, charms, necklaces, earrings, pins, tie pins and tie clasps, brooches, cufflinks, money clips, all of made of precious metal and alloyed precious metal | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 13, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 5, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 31, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |