Drawing for HEALTHMARKETINSIGHTS

USPTO serial 78083737

HEALTHMARKETINSIGHTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BALDWIN, SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HEALTHMARKETINSIGHTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DANA B ROBINSON

DANA B. ROBINSON Dana Robinson & AssociatesP.O. Box 1416La Jolla, CA 92038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009EFFICIENCY OPTIMIZATION SOFTWARE FOR USE BY HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS AND MEDICAL MANUFACTURERS TO ANALYZE OPERATIONAL INFORMATION AND CALCULATE MEASURE TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE; HEALTHCARE SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING AND IMPROVING A HOSPITAL'S CLINICAL PERFORMANCE USING EXTERNAL BENCHMARKS AND COMPARISONS; SOFTWARE FOR COMPARING A HOSPITAL'S CHARGES TO THOSE OF THE LOCAL MARKET COMPETITION AND GENERATE RATINGS, REPORTS AND SCORECARDS TO ASSESS COMPETITIVE POSITIONS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR CONDUCTING HEALTHCARE-RELATED CONSUMER RESEARCH AND SURVEYS; ELECTRONIC DATABASES IN THE FIELD OF HEALTHCARE RECORDED ON COMPUTER MEDIAACTIVEDec 31, 2001
016PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, REPORTS, INFORMATION SHEETS, SCORECARDS, BROCHURES, PAMPHLETS, BOOKLETS, PRINTED FORMS AND NEWSLETTERS ABOUT HEALTHCARE CONTENT, QUALITY AND PRICING, AND HEALTHCARE-RELATED SERVICES; PHOTOGRAPHS; MAPS; GRAPHIC ART REPRODUCTIONS AND IMAGES; PRINTED SURVEY ANSWER SHEETS; AND BUSINESS FORMSACTIVEDec 31, 2001
042PROVIDING TEMPORARY USE OF NON-DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR ACCESSING A DATABASE OF HEALTHCARE BUSINESS INFORMATION AND CREATING STRATEGIC REPORTS CONCERNING QUALITY, COST, VARIABILITY, OUTCOMES AND PATIENT SATISFACTIONACTIVEDec 31, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 30, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 30, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 8, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 14, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 22, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 15, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 15, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Aug 26, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 2, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 10, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance