Drawing for PHYTOPROTEOMICS

USPTO serial 78083749

PHYTOPROTEOMICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYTOPROTEOMICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Selna, Esq.

STEVEN M SELNA ESQ DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP225 BUSH ST 15TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94104-4207UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Consulting and information services in the field of dietary supplement selection, evaluation and management, namely, the use of genetic information, studies, and surveys in the selection and use of botanical and herbal extracts, and dietary supplements; consulting services and the study of the relation between herbal extracts and dietary supplements, and genetic information and genetic predispositionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
May 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 18, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 7, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Aug 8, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 17, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 3, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 9, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 27, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 17, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 4, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance