Drawing for WILD STALLION

USPTO serial 78083758

WILD STALLION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with WILD STALLION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patricia A. Cigelnik

PATRICIA A CIGELNIK ORUM & ROTH53 W JACKSON BLVD STE 1616CHICAGO, IL 60604-3750UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Bars, pellets, biscuits, powders, granules, balls, confections, beverages, and chewing gum forms of nutritional energy food product containing vitamins, minerals, herbs, caffeine, ginseng, glucose and/or sucrose.ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Jul 1, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jun 6, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance