Drawing for ELECTRO ETCH

USPTO serial 78083764

ELECTRO ETCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELECTRO ETCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Virginia S. Taylor

VIRGINIA S TAYLOR KILPATRICK & STOCKTON1100 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 2800ATLANTA, GA 30309-4530UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electric generators and component sub-assembly parts therefor; flow field plates, separators, and electrodes all being parts of mobile electric generatorsACTIVE—
009Batteries and component sub-assembly parts therefor; electric accumulators and component sub-assembly parts therefor; electrochemical fuel cells and component sub-assembly parts therefor; electrolysis apparatus for electroplating purposes and component subassembly parts therefor; flow field plates, separators, and electrodes all being parts of batteries, accumulators, fuel cellsACTIVE—
011Hydrogen generators and component sub-assembly parts therefor; flow field plates, separators, and electrodes all being parts of hydrogen generators and mobile hydrogen generatorsACTIVE—
040Treatment of materials, namely, milling, engraving, surface treatment, grinding, cutting, scribing, bonding of metals, glass, ceramics, plastics, polymers, elastomers, carbon-reinforced materials, graphite, and polymeric composites; applying and maintaining surface treatments in the form of coatings to metals, glass, ceramics, plastics, polymers, elastomers, carbon-reinforced materials, graphite, and polymeric composites; bonding fuel cell membranes, electroplating fuel cell cathodes and anodesACTIVE—
042Scientific research, materials testing, chemical analysis, providing technical information all in the field of electrical power generation and storage; research, development, and design for others of batteries, accumulators, fuel cells, hydrogen generators, electrolysis apparatus, and mobile generators; research, development, and design for others of component sub-assemblies for batteries, accumulators, fuel cells, hydrogen generators, electrolysis apparatus, and mobile generators; research, development, and design for others of flow field plates, separators, and electrodes all being parts of batteries, accumulators, fuel cells, hydrogen generators, electrolysis apparatus, and mobile generatorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 25, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 25, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 8, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 31, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 4, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 31, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 11, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 20, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 23, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance