USPTO serial 78084200
PROVEN PERFORMANCE MILLION MILE ENGINE OIL 15W40
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 8, 2003
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROVEN PERFORMANCE MILLION MILE ENGINE OIL 15W40?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Columbia, SC
Norwell, MA
TORONTO, CA
TORONTO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo J. Bufalino
Angelo J. Bufalino VEDDER PRICE P.C.222 N LASALLE Street - 24th FloorCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Engine oil | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Safety-Kleen Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFETY-KLEEN CANADA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFETY-KLEEN CANADA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SAFETY-KLEEN CANADA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named PROVEN PERFORMANCE MILLION MILE ENGINE OIL 15W40
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 8, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 4, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 4, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 15, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 23, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 28, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |