USPTO serial 78084400
Serial No. 78084400
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78084400?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David H. Deits
KEVIN S COSTANZA SEED IP LAW GROUP PLLC701 FIFTH AVE STE 5400SEATTLE, WA 98104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical devices, namely, medical stents; ophthalmologic implants; joint implants; bone implants; orthopedic support implants; orthopedic prostheses; nerve guides; tissue fillers; ossicular implants; Eustachian tube splints; Eustachian tube stents; tympanostomy tubes; cochlear implants; nasal lacramal stents; sinus packing; sinus vents; sinus drains; tracheostomy tubes; endotracheal tubes; voice box implants; implants for soft tissue augmentation; facial implants; surgical drains; meshes; sutures; uterine implants; fallopian tube implants; fallopian tube stents; artificial sphincters; periurethral implants; uretic stents; indwelling catheters; bladder augmentations; wraps for vasovasotomy; splints for vasovasotomy; central venous catheters; urinary catheters; gastrointestional drains; rectal stents; adhesive barriers; dural implants; dural patches; medical shunts; cardiovascular catheters; gastrointestinal catheters; gastro intestinal catheters; genitourinary catheters; cardiovascular infusion lines; cardiovascular ports; angioplasty balloons; brachy therapy seeds; and stent graphs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 6, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 19, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |