USPTO serial 78084684
FIRE BALLZ! HOT 'N SPICY CHEESE BALLS!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIRE BALLZ! HOT 'N SPICY CHEESE BALLS!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
South Beloit, IL
South Beloit, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kimberly A. Wingate
RANDY MORROW VICE PRESIDENT MCCLEARY INC239 OAK GRV AVESOUTH BELOIT, IL 61080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | cheese flavored snacks, namely cheese balls | ABANDONED | Nov 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 1, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |