USPTO serial 78084986
PICOISLAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PICOISLAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANTHONY B DIEPENBROCK III
ANTHONY B DIEPENBROCK III DECHERT LLPPO BOX 10004PALO ALTO, CA 94303-0961UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computers; computer hardware; digital signal processing (DSP) hardware; computer chips; semiconductors; semiconductor chips; microprocessors; integrated circuits; microcomputers; computer chipsets; circuit boards; logic circuits in an integrated silicon substrate; computer motherboards and daughter boards; computer graphics boards; computer peripherals; electronic apparatus for use with computers, namely, hard disk drives, DVD players, computer monitors, liquid crystal displays, LCD panels; apparatus and equipment for recording, processing, receiving, reproducing, transmitting, modifying, compressing, decompressing, broadcasting, merging and/or enhancing sound, video images, graphics, and data; communications networking equipment, namely high-speed routers, switches, access concentrators, adapters, gateways; manuals provided with all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |