Drawing for INTELLENT

USPTO serial 78084991

INTELLENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edwin J. Broecker

MICHELLE A KAISER SOMMER BARNARD ACKERSON, PCONE INDIANA SQ STE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer software consultation; intellectual property consultation; application service provider (ASP) and application hosting featuring software for collecting, classifying, managing, analyzing and presenting qualitative and quantitative business information in all forms of media for the purposes of knowledge management, market intelligence or competitive intelligence; consultation related to the foregoing; computer software development, customization, technical support and updates; leasing and/or rental of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 21, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 19, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 19, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 1, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 13, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 3, 2002EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 20, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance