Drawing for ACROCARE

USPTO serial 78086077

ACROCARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASTELO, ELVIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ACROCARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cynthia B. Summerfield

J PAUL WILLIAMSON FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI LLP801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2623UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for entering new medical patient data into a database containing pre-recorded medical patient data, and for managing and analyzing medical patient data relating to the treatment of acromegaly within the databaseACTIVE—
016printed publications, namely, books, journals, newsletters and magazines containing medical patient data relating to the treatment of acromegaly, and related topicsACTIVE—
042Maintaining and managing patient medical history records and files; compiling medical patient data from a variety of sources for others; medical data analysis, namely, analysis of patient data to track patient progress on individual patient and on groups of patients; providing medical information, namely, producing reports for both individual patients and aggregates of patients relating to the treatment of acromegalyACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 1, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 30, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 13, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 7, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 7, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance