USPTO serial 78086290
STONEWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STONEWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nathan C. Belzer
NATHAN C BELZER TRAVISLOCKE LIDDELL & SAPP LLP600 TRAVIS ST STE 3400HOUSTON, TX 77002-2910Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Coffee sold to restaurants, schools, hospitals, military bases and institutions | ACTIVE | Mar 4, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2003 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |