USPTO serial 78086710
CODI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYS, PAULA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CODI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gerald Altman
GERALD ALTMAN MORSE, ALTMAN & MARTIN6 BEACON ST STE 600BOSTON, MN 02108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Sportswear, namely, sports jackets that provide horizontally extending fasteners along the front and/or back for attachment of selective decorative stripes, and sports pants that provide vertically extending fasteners along the opposite sides for the attachment of selective decorative stripes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |