Drawing for ESSENTIAL BRANDING

USPTO serial 78086781

ESSENTIAL BRANDING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2739058Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 15, 2003
Examiner
LUTHEY, LYNN A
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ESSENTIAL BRANDING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela C. Wilcox

Angela C. Wilcox Vanek, Vickers & Masini, P.C.111 South Wacker DriveSuite 4050Chicago, IL 60606

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and business consulting services, namely, market analysis and research; advertising services for others, namely, promoting goods and services of others through planning, creation and distribution of advertising; marketing services, namely, brand development and packaging design, and design of media advertisingSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 15, 2002
042Design of broadband multimedia services and communications systems for othersSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDApr 15, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2009C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 3, 2009ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 13, 2009C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Jan 13, 2009FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Jul 31, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 24, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 18, 2003CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 7, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 21, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 21, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 5, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 5, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 1, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 14, 2001GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance