USPTO serial 78086786
XTREME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERKINS, KARLA M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with XTREME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Michelman
JEFFREY L MICHELMAN MERAMECBLUMENFELD, KAPLAN & SANDWEISS, PC168 N MERAMEC AVE STE 400ST LOUIS, MO 63105-3758Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | portable, home, or mobile audio, video, home theater, and navigational products or systems or varying nature, namely, radios; CD players/recorders; radios incorporating clocks; home stereos; boom boxes; audio cassette players/recorders; receiver; tuners; power inverters; liquid crystal displays; DVD players/recorders; televisions; video cassette players/recorders; set top interface boxes; and flat screen monitors; telephones and telephone answering machines; portable, home, or mobile audio, video, home theater, and navigational products or systems or varying nature, namely, MP3 players/recorders; WMA players/recorders; global positioning satellite systems consisting of antenna, decoder, reader, processor, and monitor; personal video recorders; and satellite receivers | ACTIVE | Jul 24, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 1, 2003 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |