USPTO serial 78087123
PATCHEDIN!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PATCHEDIN!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New Brunswick, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Ryan, Jr.
MICHAEL J RYAN JR JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CORP1 JOHNSON AND JOHNSON PLZNEW BRUNSWICK, NJ 08933-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Educational services, namely, providing live assistance via telephone and on-line communication, to establish successful use with birth control methods and to provide pertinent health communications and tips for the user, and the distribution of materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | Jul 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2004 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |