Drawing for GIZMO

USPTO serial 78087151

GIZMO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIZMO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin M. Kercher

KEVIN M KERCHER BLACKWELL SANDERS PEPER MARTIN LLP720 OLIVE ST 24TH FLST LOUIS, MO 63101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Containers of metal for the storage and transportation of goods; containers of metal for compressed gas; containers of metal for liquefied gas; containers of metal for pressurized liquid; containers of metal for inserting into drink containers; metal inserts for drink containersACTIVE—
020Containers, not of metal, for commercial use; containers, not of metal, for compressed gas; containers, not of metal, for liquefied gas; containers, not of metal, for pressurized liquid; containers for commercial use, namely, plastic containers for the storage and transportation of goods, for compressed gas, for liquefied gas, and for pressurized liquid; containers, not of metal, for inserting into drink containers; inserts, not of metal, for drink containers; containers for commercial use, namely, glass containers for the storage and transportation of goods, for compressed gas, for liquefied gas and for pressurized liquidACTIVE—
021Glass bottles for the storage and transportation of goods; portable plastic containers for storing household and kitchen goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 20, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 30, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 13, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2003GNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED—
Dec 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 5, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance