USPTO serial 78087271
IPL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IPL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tally Eitan
TALLY EITAN EITAN, PEARL, LATZER & COHEN ZEDEK LLP10 ROCKEFELLER PLZ STE 1001NEW YORK, NY 10020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | INTENSE PULSED LIGHT APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS WHICH TREAT FACIAL VASCULAR ERYTHEMA AND PIGMENTARY SKIN DAMAGE, ELIMINATE BENIGN PIGMENTED LESIONS AND TATTOOS, AND FOR HAIR AND WRINKLE REMOVAL FOR MEDICAL, SURGICAL, DENTAL AND AESTHETIC USES | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | MEDICAL SERVICES; HYGIENIC AND BEAUTY CARE SERVICES, NAMELY, INTENSE PULSED LIGHT TREATMENTS FOR TREATING FACIAL VASCULAR ERYTHEMA AND PIGMENTARY SKIN DAMAGE, ELIMINATING BENIGN PIGMENTED LESIONS AND TATTOOS, AND REMOVING HAIR AND WRINKLES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 23, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 4, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |