USPTO serial 78087572
GLITTER CRITTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GLITTER CRITTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Diettrich
ROBERT J DIETTRICH DAVIS, MALM & D'AGOSTINE PCONE BOSTON PLBOSTON, MA 02108UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | VIDEO GAME CARTRIDGES; INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAME PROGRAMS; COMPUTER GAME EQUIPMENT, NAMELY JOYSTICKS, COMPUTER GAME CARTRIDGES, PROGRAMS AND TAPES | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | TOYS AND GAMES, NAMELY SKATEBOARDS AND SKATEBOARD BAGS; ACTION FIGURINES AND ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; SPORTS GAMES IN THE NATURE OF BALLS, NAMELY BASKETBALLS, PLAYGROUND BALLS, SPORT BALLS, FOAM BALLS, TOY BASKETBALL GOAL SETS; TOY BANKS; TOY WATCHES, BATH TUB TOYS; CHILDREN'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; WATER SQUIRTING TOYS; TOY VEHICLES; WIND UP TOYS; JUMP ROPES; SLING SHOTS; AUDIO TOY SETS COMPRISED OF A CARD GAME AND AUDIO CASSETTE SOLD AS A UNIT, TOY TWO-WAY RADIOS; VISUAL TOYS, NAMELY 3-D VIEWERS; ACTION TARGET GAMES; BOARD GAMES; CARD GAMES; ELECTRONIC DART GAMES; STAND ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES; ELECTRONIC GAME EQUIPMENT CONTAINING MEMORY DEVICES, NAMELY HAND-HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES WITH A WATCH FUNCTION; HAND HELD LIQUID CRYSTAL DISPLAY GAME UNITS FOR PLAYING VIDEO GAMES; STAND ALONE VIDEO OUTPUT GAME MACHINES; COIN AND NON-COIN OPERATED GAME TABLES; PINBALL GAMES; JIGSAW PUZZLES; MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES; MECHANICAL TOY ROBOTS; BATTERY OPERATED TOY FIGURES; DOLLS; PUPPETS AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; PLAYSETS FOR DOLLS; DOLL CLOTHING AND COSTUMES; CHILDREN'S PLAY COSMETICS; TOY WEAPONS; TOY SQUIRT GUNS; KITES; PAPER AND PLASTIC PARTY FAVORS IN THE NATURE OF SMALL TOYS AND NOISEMAKERS; BALLOONS; STUFFED AND PLUSH TOYS; LATEX SQUEEZE TOYS IN THE NATURE OF ANIMALS AND CHARACTERS; MUSICAL TOYS; INFLATABLE BATH TOYS; SWIMMING TOYS, NAMELY SWIMMING FLOATS FOR RECREATIONAL USE; RIDE-ON-TOYS; TOY VEHICLES; RIDE IN TOYS; INFLATABLE SWIMMING POOLS; TOY HOUSES AND TENTS; SURF BOARDS; FLOTATION KICK BOARDS; BODY BOARDS AND LEASHES THEREFOR, TOY SAND BOXES AND SAND TOYS, NAMELY PAILS AND SHOVELS; SLEDS; TOBOGGANS; SNOW SAUCERS; SNOW BOARDS; TOY BUILDING BLOCKS; MOBILES FOR CHILDREN; FLYING DISCS; PET TOYS AND YO-YOS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KVIP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Kenn Viselman Presents
- Other trademarks owned by Kenn Viselman Presents
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named GLITTER CRITTERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 26, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |