USPTO serial 78087931
ATUM TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2915020Status 713
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 2004
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ATUM TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lin-Yun Cheng
TAIPEI, 00000 ATUM TECHNOLOGY INC7F., NO 32, LN 583 RUI-KUANG RD NEI HU DISTRICT,TAIWANGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; COMPUTER DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES; CONSULTING SERVICE IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2006 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 1, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |