Drawing for ONESMART MASTERCARD

USPTO serial 78087970

ONESMART MASTERCARD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOYNER, CHARLES G
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ONESMART MASTERCARD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009ENCODED INTEGRATED CIRCUIT CARDS, NAMELY SMART CARDS CONTAINING PROGRAMMING USED TO CONDUCT FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS; AND MAGNETIC ENCODED CARDS, NAMELY, CREDIT CARDS, DEBIT CARDS, AND PAYMENT CARDSACTIVEApr 8, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 18, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 18, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 2, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jul 8, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 19, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance