USPTO serial 78088434
EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EXECUTIVE PERSPECTIVES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karen A. Barrett
KAREN A BARRETT HEALTHMARKETINSIGHTS, LLC2620 REGATTA DR #208LAS VEGAS, NV 89128UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | For computer software, databases, ratings, reports, scorecards, consumer research and surveys, and Internet-delivered applications for use in providing discounted healthcare-related services and in publishing information about healthcare content, quality and pricing, and related services. | ACTIVE | Mar 8, 1993 |
| 016 | Use in reports, which may include but are not limited to: the APC Readiness Assessment, a report which quantifies the payment impact of being paid under APC's through HCFA's new prospective payment system; the Department Productivity Analysis, a report which enables decision-makers to identify cost management strategies; the Inpatient Cost Diagnostic, a report which examines a hospital's clinical performance; the Managed Care Diagnostic, a report which forecasts the impact of a highly-managed care model; the Outpatient Charge Analysis, a report which compares hospital-specific outpatient performance; the Product Market Analysis, a report which looks at specific volume, charge and reimbursement activity for specific set of inpatient codes that relate to a medical device; the Physician Performance Analysis, a report which provides an analysis that profiles severity adjusted costs, outcomes, and length of stay by specific physicians and specialty groups, and the Top 25 DRG Analysis, an analysis that profiles the top 25 inpatient DRG's of a specific hospital versus a peer group of hospitals by client specification. | ACTIVE | Mar 8, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |