Drawing for CROPLIFE FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 78088553

CROPLIFE FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROPLIFE FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul F. Kilmer

PAUL F KILMER HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Charitable fundraising services aimed at promoting sustainable agriculture and the environmentally sound use of crop protection products and bioengineered agriculture for the economical production of safe, high quality, abundant food, fiber and other cropsACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely conducting workshops and seminars in the field of promoting sustainable agriculture and the environmentally sound use of crop protection products and bioengineered agriculture for the economical production of safe, high quality, abundant food, fiber and other cropsACTIVE—
042Scientific research in the field of promoting sustainable agriculture and the environmentally sound use of crop protection products and bioengineered agriculture for the economical production of safe, high quality, abundant food, fiber and other cropsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 6, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 22, 2002GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 9, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance