USPTO serial 78088553
CROPLIFE FOUNDATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CROPLIFE FOUNDATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul F. Kilmer
PAUL F KILMER HOLLAND & KNIGHT, LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WSTE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006-6801Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Charitable fundraising services aimed at promoting sustainable agriculture and the environmentally sound use of crop protection products and bioengineered agriculture for the economical production of safe, high quality, abundant food, fiber and other crops | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely conducting workshops and seminars in the field of promoting sustainable agriculture and the environmentally sound use of crop protection products and bioengineered agriculture for the economical production of safe, high quality, abundant food, fiber and other crops | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research in the field of promoting sustainable agriculture and the environmentally sound use of crop protection products and bioengineered agriculture for the economical production of safe, high quality, abundant food, fiber and other crops | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |