USPTO serial 78088767
ENVIROSCRUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENVIROSCRUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dean R. Karau
Dean R. Karau Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.Suite 4000200 South Sixth StreetMinneapolis, MN 55402-1425Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Compounds in the nature of chemical sorbents used for the removal and capture of pollutants from combustion gas streams; chemical compounds obtained from the processing of chemical sorbents used for the removal of pollutants from combustion gases | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Pollution control and removal units and scrubbers for combustion gas streams in the field of environmental control, and waste stream reduction for combustion gas streams | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of pollution and environmental control of combustion gas streams, waste stream reduction for combustion gas streams, and generation of useful, marketable products from pollutants removed from combustion gas streams | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EnviroScrub Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by EnviroScrub Technologies Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENVIROSCRUB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 12, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |