USPTO serial 78088878
SOYLIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BERK, STEVEN R
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOYLIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electrical food processor and a soymilk maker, namely, an electrical appliance that heats water and grinds soybeans, rice, almonds or other food products to make milk | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |