Drawing for COLOR PLANET

USPTO serial 78089173

COLOR PLANET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYES, GINA CLARK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COLOR PLANET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SHAUN BELL

STEVEN M WEINBERG GREENBERG TRAURIG2375 E CAMELBACK RD STE 700PHOENIX, AZ 85016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Magnetic encoded card readers; blank magnetic computer tapes; blank computer discs; all for bearing recorded data; computer hardware; computer firmware for storing, indexing, retrieving, manipulating and displaying photographs and imagesACTIVE—
016Photographs; books, printed publications, periodicals and magazines on the subjects of photographs, travel, colours, people and countriesACTIVE—
035Distributorships in the fields of photographs, books, printed publications, motion pictures and audio-visual presentations; licensing of photographs, books, printed publications, motion pictures and audio-visual presentations; retail stores in the field of photographs, books, printed publications, motion pictures and audio-visual presentationsACTIVE—
039ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF PHOTOGRAPHS AND IMAGESACTIVE—
041Electronic publishing services, namely, publication of text, photographic and graphic works of others on CD-ROMs and online on the subjects of photographs, travel, colours, people and countries; publication of books and magazinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 4, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 4, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 4, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 23, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 28, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 5, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 17, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 1, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 9, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 27, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance