USPTO serial 78089568
PERDURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2931526Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 8, 2005
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PERDURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Jonquiere, Province of Quebec, CA
Jonquiere, Province of Quebec, CA
Jonquiere, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN ST-AMANT
MARTIN ST-AMANT CAIN LAMARRE CASGRAIN WELLS580 GRANDE-ALLEE EST BUREAU 440QUEBEC CITY (QUEBEC), G1R2K2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Commercial steel oven for treating wood at high temperatures | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 31, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | AMPX | APPLICANT AMENDMENT PRIOR TO EXAMINATION | — |