USPTO serial 78089586
MICRO-MATRIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MICRO-MATRIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Petersburg, FL
St. Petersburg, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott W. Kelley
SCOTT W KELLEY KELLY BAUERSFELD LOWRY & KELLEY, LLP6320 CANOGA AVE STE 1650WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BODY AND SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, NON-MEDICATED ANTI-WRINKLE CREAMS, MOISTURIZERS, NIGHT CREAMS AND LOTIONS, FACE CLEANSERS, BODY CLEANSERS, EXFOLIATING CREAMS AND LOTIONS, FACE MASKS, EYE CREAMS, HAND MASKS, HAND LOTIONS, BODY MASKS, SUN SCREEN PREPARATIONS, BATH GELS, BATH OILS, BODY OILS, CONTOURING CREAMS, LOTIONS FOR MINIMIZING THE APPEARANCE OF CELLULITE; STRETCH MARK CREAMS AND LOTIONS FOR MINIMIZING THE APPEARANCE OF STRETCH MARKS AND SCARRING, AND SUN TANNING PREPARATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 3, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 3, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 1, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |